Readers write: Rebuilding Better Problems, Compassion, Humility and Disbelief, Abortion, Police Presence


A recent online comment inappropriately blamed Democratic Party leaders for the difficulty in passing the Build Back Better bill. Author Matthew Yglesias complained that the BBB is “a catch-all of progressive ideas” rather than “thematically coherent legislation”. He is wrong.

Building Back Better is a response to an economic mess that began with the dismantling of federal government programs under President Ronald Reagan. For four decades, conservative opposition to this nation’s common wealth has seized power by turning the nation against collective action to help lift all boats (mistakenly calling it “socialism”), against science, against the reasoned debate in favor of insults, against unions, against the environment, against all people with access to the vote, and more.

Ask yourself why our people are so angry and stressed. Look at how thin our lives have become. Climate change is a monster that disrupts every decision we make. The mutant virus threatens the economy.

We don’t need to take the objections of someone like US Senator Joe Manchin seriously. We must listen to the promises of President Joe Biden’s vision for a stronger nation.

We need to build back better. Even Goldman Sachs has shown that without it, the economy would suffer.

This nation has enough money to close the wealth gap. The attitude of the American people stands in the way.

Melinda Quivik, St. Paul


As a church pastor in the late 1950s, I considered myself a politically independent, but generally voted Republican. In a conversation with a parishioner I knew to be a Democrat, I asked him why he was. He replied, “Because I think Democrats help the poor more. “

I have thought about this remark many times, and over the years it seems to be true.

Efforts such as Social Security, Medicare, SNAP, Civil Rights Legislation, and the Affordable Care Act are among the many programs that Democrats have started that have certainly helped those in need and helped people in need. many members of the middle class.

What major programs or legislation has the Republican Party put in place to help the poor? I find it hard to think about it. A few years ago, Paul Ryan declared that poverty was “the most persistent and enduring problem facing the country”. The solution he proposed was to make sure people on welfare looked for work and to limit social services offered by the federal government while reducing corporate tax rates. It would help them lift themselves out of their poverty.

But did it work? Corporate tax cuts have helped the rich get richer but not so much the poor, even though the unemployment rate has fallen very low. Republican friends believe that it is not the role of government to help the poor but rather the job of individuals and charities to do so. But doesn’t our Constitution say that government must “promote general welfare”?

Paul Pallmeyer, Lake Elmo


A writer from December 19 (“The Missing Ingredients: Compassion, Humility”) was absolutely right about two things: the incident in Hastings, Minn., Was terrible, and we shouldn’t be mean to people. vulnerable. However, at the end of his letter he seems to suggest that the reason he chose not to be cruel is a book and moral code written by a supernatural being.

I do not agree. As a longtime atheist, I have a moral code that comes from the need to have a functioning society, along with my values ​​of compassion, kindness and tolerance, as well as an intellectual understanding that cruelty is. , well, just awful. I remember times in my own childhood when I was mean, and I felt shame and regret then and I feel shame and regret now, looking back. As an adult, I tend to defend my values ​​better than when I was a child. Without a rulebook, I have managed not to murder, shame, go out, and hurt no one else for quite some time now.

Please give the “non” religious credit for being good people, and consider that no one should need supernatural support to refrain from harming children (or anyone else). You don’t have to believe in a god to believe in the value of “tikkun olam”, which in Hebrew means “to fix the world”. This is a good start for a code to follow: we can be good without a god.

Erica Klein, Richfield


Sarah Stoesz is quoted in Lori Sturdevant’s December 19 column (“In post-Roe Minnesota, abortion could be a powerful political issue”) that it will be “incredibly cruel” if Roe v. Wade is overthrown by the Supreme Court. I agree. But it’s incredibly cruel right now in a number of states with their own abortion laws. Women have been jailed for miscarriages, have given birth in unassisted cells with no doctors present, and have lost custody of their children while incarcerated. 21-year-old woman in Oklahoma faces four years in prison for miscarriage.

More and more religious people are asking why Christian churches are turning to a cold, harsh, and even cruel legal solution, rather than, say, following Joseph’s example in facing a pregnancy issue. A poll reported by Faithful America, a grassroots Christian community, reports that 68% of Catholics and 55% of Protestants do not want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Jim Lein, Minneapolis


Help me and maybe others better understand when we as a society should be respectful of the “unborn child” and / or of life? Sturdevant’s column deals with abortion rights and the legal choice to end the life of an unborn child, while a press article from the same day deals with the accidental death of an unborn child. Accidental death is punishable and charged as “criminal operation with a vehicle resulting in the death of an unborn child,” but the willful death of an unborn child is sanctioned by the Minnesota Constitution and the United States Supreme Court. and is celebrated.

WW Bednarczyk, Édine


I’m starting to suspect that there is a correlation between the results of the municipal mayoral election last November (and the recent city budgets being passed) and the dramatic rise in the number of patrol cars I have seen. Have noticed driving along Nicollet Avenue here in South Minneapolis. Well, I can easily count on one hand the number of police cars I have observed driving along Nicollet in the last 12 months leading up to Election Day, but just one recent afternoon when I walked with my granddaughters up to the Reverend Martin Luther. King, Jr. Park, we noticed two patrol cars passing quietly within minutes of each other. And a third the next day! My God, what the re-election of a mayor who promised a huge budget increase for our Minneapolis Police Department won’t do to get our officers back to the neighborhoods. Not that it is exactly comfort.

Beth Rademacher, Minneapolis

We want to hear from you. Send us your thoughts here.

Source link


About Author

Comments are closed.