Ingraham: Supreme Court could “finally put Roe to rest”, tears up “twisted logic” of Sotomayor

0

In her “Ingraham Angle” comment on Wednesday, host Laura Ingraham said there was decent potential for the conservative-majority United States Supreme Court to finally “put Roe to rest” and reserve the legality of the abortion to the states to determine individually.

“Today’s oral arguments in the biggest abortion case since Casey v. Planned Parenthood were fascinating to listen to and simply confirmed what Conservative jurists have argued for almost 50 years – that the reasoning in Roe [v. Wade] was pure legal fiction, ”Ingraham said.

“The court should never have embarked on the abortion war,” she added.

Ingraham said the most “revealing and disturbing” part of Wednesday’s hearing was when the court heard arguments about “stare decisis” – the idea that precedent should be generally respected and allow for a predictable development of. legal principles.

However, she said, left-wing judges like Obama’s candidate Sonia Sotomayor clashed with a lawyer, Mississippi State Attorney General Scott Stewart, over the idea that a fetus was a living being and whether the Constitution prohibits the act of killing an unborn baby.

“At this point, their main point is that Roe has been on the books for a long time and it’s too late to do anything about it. It’s absurd,” Ingraham said. “The idea that the American people are stuck with a bad decision just for the sake of tradition flies in the face of everything this country stands for.”

She stated that, according to the reasoning of the left-wing judges, the “separate but equal” decision in Plessy v. Ferguson allowing segregation should never have been overturned in Brown v. Board of Ed, based on precedents and tradition.

Deputy Justice Sonia Sotomayor poses in the official group photo at the United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC on November 30, 2018.
(MANDEL NGAN / AFP via Getty Images)

In his argument with Sotomayor, Stewart said that advances since Roe have led to further knowledge about fetal pain, ultrasound imaging that presents an unborn baby in a way that appears and is “entirely human very early on. “.

In part of his response, Sotomayor said that people who are brain dead can still show signs that their nervous system is active and human:

“There are spontaneous acts of brain dead people. So I don’t think that a response from a fetus necessarily proves that there is a sensation of pain or that there is a consciousness,” he said. she declared. “There are about 40 percent of [brain-dead] people who if it touches their feet, the foot will move back.

Ingraham sharply criticized Sotomayor, calling his comments “twisted, insensitive and uninformed.”

“By her logic, I guess pregnant women shouldn’t get too aroused when their baby kicks the womb. After all, the baby might be dead and just shaking,” the host said.

“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are only political acts? I don’t see how that is possible,” Sotomayor also asked later.

Ingraham pointed out that Sotomayor should indeed be worried about a “foul smell” – but rather a smell created in 1973 with the Roe decision, “depriving” states of 10th Amendment-style legislative powers.

FILE - In this October 18, 2011 file photo, U.S. Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia looks out of the balcony before addressing the Chicago-Kent College Law court in Chicago.  On Saturday February 13, 2016, the US Marshals Service confirmed that Scalia passed away at the age of 79.  (AP Photo / Charles Rex Arbogast, File)

FILE – In this October 18, 2011 file photo, U.S. Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia looks out of the balcony before addressing the Chicago-Kent College Law court in Chicago. On Saturday February 13, 2016, the US Marshals Service confirmed that Scalia passed away at the age of 79. (AP Photo / Charles Rex Arbogast, File)
(ASSOCIATED PRESS)

Ingraham said the late Judge Antonin Scalia put it best in this regard:

“Whether you are for the right to abortion or not … the Constitution says nothing about it. It leaves the choice to the Democrats,” said the deceased lawyer one day. “Some states have banned it. Some states haven’t. What Roe has done is that no state can ever ban it. It’s just not in the Constitution. is one of many rights not addressed in the Constitution, one of the many things in the word left to democratic choice. “

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The point is, neither the framers of the original Constitution and the Bill of Rights, nor the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment ever intended to create a constitutional right to abortion. Indeed, they would have found such a barbaric and diabolical concept. “, concluded Ingraham later.

“The left claims to care about ‘democracy’. So let the people decide the important questions posed by abortion. And if a court with a 6-person Republican nominee majority fails to put Roe to rest, then he should expect a Tory-led move to reduce the court’s power. And it would also mean “adios” for federalist society. “


Source link

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.